<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Mac Journal &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymacjournal.com/category/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymacjournal.com</link>
	<description>From a 20-in. aluminum iMac to a 2.4 GHz, 15-in. MacBook Pro (2008) and 2.93 GHz iMac (2009)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interesting tidbit about Windows 7 performance</title>
		<link>http://www.mymacjournal.com/interesting-tidbit-about-windows-7-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mymacjournal.com/interesting-tidbit-about-windows-7-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Chin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymacjournal.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Randall C. Kennedy, in Page 3 his article, The generation gap: Windows on multicore, says:
But it&#8217;s not all bad news with Windows 7. Microsoft&#8217;s new OS has a clear multicore scalability advantage over both Windows XP and Windows Vista, especially on less I/O-bound tasks like our multiprocess database workload. (We can thank SQL Server 2008 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall C. Kennedy, in <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/generation-gap-windows-multicore-273?page=0,3">Page 3 his article, The generation gap: Windows on multicore</a>, says:</p>
<blockquote><p>But it&#8217;s not all bad news with Windows 7. Microsoft&#8217;s new OS has a clear multicore scalability advantage over both Windows XP and Windows Vista, especially on less I/O-bound tasks like our multiprocess database workload. (We can thank SQL Server 2008 for that one.) In fact, with its second-generation multicore tweaking (good-bye, global lock!), Windows 7 is poised to overtake XP even earlier than Windows Vista &#8212; perhaps at 16 or 24 cores. In the meantime, you certainly won&#8217;t lose anything by moving from Vista to Windows 7, and you may even gain a few seconds here and there, thanks to its better kernel tuning.</p></blockquote>
<p>In Randall&#8217;s database transactions tests, Windows 7 would need to run on 16 to 24 core systems before it can match Windows XP in speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mymacjournal.com/interesting-tidbit-about-windows-7-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
